Semrush
Bolts AI-search visibility onto the SEO platform millions of marketers already run — prompt tracking, brand mentions and optimisation in one mature suite.
The verdict
Semrush scores 83/100 in the current Index — exceptional. It's a strong fit for mid-market, agency, enterprise teams, with mature all-in-one suite as its standout. The thing to watch is ai toolkit is a $99 add-on · no claude.
What Semrush does
Bolts AI-search visibility onto the SEO platform millions of marketers already run — prompt tracking, brand mentions and optimisation in one mature suite. It tracks 5 of the 10 answer engines we monitor (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot), and our reviewers rate it strongest on support and onboarding of the four things we score.
Hands-on with Semrush
AI VISIBILITY TOOLKIT · ONGOING USE
I came to Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit with my arms folded. We've paid for Semrush for years for the boring, essential SEO stuff, and “new AI add-on from the incumbent” usually means a thin feature stapled on to keep churn down. Cynical, maybe. Earned, definitely.
Then I actually used it, and the cynicism didn't survive the first week.
The unfair advantage
The thing the pure-play tools can't easily copy is this: I was already there. The AI visibility data sits a click away from the keyword and rank-tracking data I check anyway, on the platform my team already lives in. No new login, no new invoice to argue over, no separate tab that quietly gets forgotten. For a lot of teams that convenience alone decides it.
The toolkit tracks how your brand shows up across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google's AI Mode and Copilot — prompt tracking, brand mentions, sentiment, and the gaps where competitors are getting cited and you aren't. It refreshes daily, which after OmniSEO's monthly default felt like a luxury.
Semrush's edge isn't that it's the deepest AI tool. It's that it's good enough, and it's already open in the other tab.
Where it's genuinely strong
Two things stand out. The support and documentation are a cut above anyone else in this roundup — when something confused me, the answer was a search away, which is not something I can say for most of the newer tools. And tying AI visibility to the SEO work you're already doing means the recommendations land in a workflow that actually exists, rather than as an orphaned to-do list.
The catch
The pricing reads as friendly until you do the maths. The AI Visibility Toolkit is $99/mo — on top of a Semrush plan that already runs from a couple of hundred a month. So the “$99” is really $99 plus whatever you're already paying, and on the lower tiers a couple of engines (Gemini, Google AI Mode) are themselves paid add-ons. It's good value if you're already a Semrush shop; it's an expensive way in if you're not.
Two other things to know. There's no Claude tracking, which is a real gap if your buyers lean on it. And because the toolkit is newer than the rest of Semrush, it isn't as deep on pure AI-visibility analytics as a specialist like Profound — it's broad and convenient rather than the last word on any single engine.
Who it's for
If you already run Semrush, switching this on is close to a no-brainer — you get credible AI-visibility tracking inside the tool you check every day, with support that won't leave you stranded. If you're not a Semrush shop, weigh the total cost against a focused tool: you may get deeper data for less from a specialist. Either way, it's the safest, most established pick on this list, and for a lot of teams “safe and already paid for” is exactly the right answer.
Semrush pricing
Semrush starts at $99/mo. Current offer: Free trial available.
- ·AI Visibility Toolkit $99/mo
- ·Semrush One plans $199–$549/mo
- ·Gemini & Google AI Mode are add-ons on some tiers
Strengths & watch-outs
Engine coverage
Tracks 5 of 10 major answer engines — check the gaps before you commit.
Who should use Semrush
Semrush makes most sense for mid-market, agency, enterprise teams. If hands-on support and onboarding matter to you, it's worth a look. If your priorities sit elsewhere, the alternatives below may fit better.


